nmdar antagonist memantine (MedChemExpress)
Structured Review

Nmdar Antagonist Memantine, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 8 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/nmdar antagonist memantine/product/MedChemExpress
Average 94 stars, based on 8 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Neuronal TCF7L2 in Lateral Habenula Is Involved in Stress-Induced Depression"
Article Title: Neuronal TCF7L2 in Lateral Habenula Is Involved in Stress-Induced Depression
Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences
doi: 10.3390/ijms252212404
Figure Legend Snippet: NMDAR was involved in TCF7L2-mediated depressive-like behavior. ( A ) Experimental timeline for NMDAR agonist-NMDA administration and behavioral tests. ( B ) Effects of NMDA administration on latency to the first immobility in the TST with LHb neurons special TCF7L2 knockdown, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled + Saline: 106, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled + NMDA: 111.9, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2 + Saline: 111.1, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2 + NMDA: 108.8. ( C ) Total immobility time in the TST, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled + Saline: 57.75, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled + NMDA: 52.45, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2 + Saline: 8.143, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2 + NMDA: 62.63. ( D ) Effects of NMDA administration on latency to the first floating in the FST, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled + Saline: 72.36, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled + NMDA: 95.45, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2 + Saline: 110.9, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2 + NMDA: 102.6. ( E ) Total floating time in the FST, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled + Saline: 106.1, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled + NMDA: 120.7, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2 + Saline: 45, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2 + NMDA: 134.7. ( F ) Experimental timeline for NMDAR antagonist-memantine administration and behavioral tests. ( G ) Effects of memantine administration on latency to the first immobility in the TST with LHb neurons special TCF7L2 overexpression, mean of AAV-EGFP + Saline: 85.25, mean of AAV-EGFP + Memantine: 88.25, mean of AAV-TCF7L2 + Saline: 50.75, mean of AAV-TCF7L2 + Memantine: 80.05. ( H ) Total immobility time in the TST, mean of AAV-EGFP + Saline: 79.75, mean of AAV-EGFP + Memantine: 75.38, mean of AAV-TCF7L2 + Saline: 131.5, mean of AAV-TCF7L2 + Memantine: 72.38. ( I ) Effects of memantine administration on latency to the first floating in the FST, mean of AAV-EGFP + Saline: 91.5, mean of AAV-EGFP + Memantine: 100.8, mean of AAV-TCF7L2 + Saline: 35, mean of AAV-TCF7L2 + Memantine: 82.5. ( J ) Total floating time in the FST, mean of AAV-EGFP + Saline: 32.25, mean of AAV-EGFP + Memantine: 44.63, mean of AAV-TCF7L2 + Saline: 157.5, mean of AAV-TCF7L2 + Memantine: 77.88. Comparisons between groups were conducted using one-way ANOVA. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. n = 7–11 per group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Techniques Used: Knockdown, Saline, Over Expression
![A The cfos-shEGFP transgenic mouse, expressing a short half-life (sh)EGFP under the control of the cfos promoter. B Experimental design in which the cfos-shEGFP mouse was either used for whole-cell recordings or memory recall tests after different behavior treatments. Ctxt context, EC external capsule, IC internal capsule, BLA basolateral amygdala. C Freezing response to the context (blue bars) and/or tone (orange bars) measured 24 h after correspondent behavior treatment. N = 8 per group, except in “Context only” group, in which N = 6. D Whole-cell recording design. Panel I shows stimulating electrode over internal capsule fiber bundle. II and III illustrate ongoing whole-cell recording (red asterisk) of a GFP + neuron. IV-VI are confocal images of neighboring neurons filled with Alexa 594 during recordings: the GFP + neuron is highlighted by a yellow arrow, while the GFP − is highlighted by a cyan arrow. Scale bars: 50 µm. These images were taken from a slice of an Arc-tTA/TetO-H2B-GFP mouse ( F ). E <t>AMPAR/NMDAR</t> ratio of GFP + vs GFP − BLA neurons from acute brain slices of cfos-shEGFP mice sac’ed 90 min after behavior treatment. An increase in AMPAR/NMDAR ratio was only observed after successful conditioning and was restricted to GFP + neurons. N = 6–9 per group. F Arc-tTA x TetO-H2BGFP double transgenic mouse, in which the tetracycline transactivator (tTA) was knocked in the Arc gene and controls the expression of the long-lasting histone-bound GFP. G Experimental design illustrating the tagging window of the Arc-tTA/TetO-H2B-GFP mouse line, controlled by the presence of Doxycycline (Dox) in the food. Tagged neurons were recorded 7 days after. Correspondent behavior result can be found on Supplementary Fig. . H Specific AMPAR/NMDAR ratio increase in GFP + neurons following conditioning is maintained for at least 7 days. CFC Contextual fear conditioning. N = 8, 9 per group. ** P < 0.01, **** P < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey test ( C ), unpaired t test [( E ) and ( H )]. Graph bars show mean +/−SEM.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_7600/pmc12137600/pmc12137600__42003_2025_8140_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
